J Cancer 2021; 12(20):6118-6125. doi:10.7150/jca.60739 This issue
1. Department of Pathology, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
2. Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou City, Hunan, 423000, China.
3. Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
#These authors contributed equally to this work.
Aims: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is the ligand of programmed death 1 (PD-1), which is a host immunity inhibitory receptor. Expression of PD-L1 in diverse tumor types has been widely discussed, while there is little research about tumor intrinsic-PD-1. Phospho-S6 (p-S6) is an important downstream effector in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Our study was focused on investigating expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1 and p-S6 proteins and aimed to illustrate their relationship and clinical significances in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Methods: The expression of PD-1, PD-L1 and p-S6 proteins in tissues of NPC, non-cancerous nasopharyngeal epithelia, primary cancer and matching metastatic lesion was detected by immunohistochemistry.
Results: Expression of PD-1, PD-L1 and p-S6 proteins and co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 were significantly higher in NPC (all P<0.05). The expression of PD-1 and co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in paired metastatic NPC were significantly increased (all P<0.01). NPC patients with positive expression of PD-L1 showed significantly higher overall survival rate (P =0.035). However, NPC patients with positive expression PD-1 and p-S6 showed significantly lower overall survival rate (P =0.031, P=0.044, respectively). Interestingly, NPC patients with co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 had lower overall survival rate (P=0.042). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis confirmed that positive expression of PD-L1 and p-S6 were independent prognostic factors for NPC patients.
Conclusions: Expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1 associates with PD-L1 and p-S6 proteins, PD-L1 might serve as a good prognostic biomarker, while p-S6 could be an independent poor prognostic biomarker for NPC patients.
Keywords: nasopharyngeal carcinoma, cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6, prognosis
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common cancers in Asia, especially in southern China . Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a recognized cause of NPC. Infection, genetic susceptibility, high nitrite food and smoking are independent risk factors for NPC . Nowadays, treatments of NPC are mainly radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Patients with early-stage of NPC could benefit from radiotherapy or/and chemotherapy, thereby obtaining a longer survival time [3, 4]. Unfortunately, most NPC patients, at the time of diagnosis, are already in the advanced stage, and chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy or immune treatment still cannot significantly effectively extend the survival time of them. [5-7]. In recent years, studies have found that immune escape of tumor cells and abnormal activation of signaling pathways play important roles in the occurrence and development of NPC . Finding new targets of NPC will provide new clues for exploring more effective treatment of NPC patients.
Programmed death 1 (PD-1), a cell membrane protein with 288 amino acids, is a protein from the CD28 superfamily. The expression of tumor cell-intrinsic programmed death 1 (PD-1) played an important role in melanoma tumorigenesis . As one of major ligands of PD-1, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) also takes part in the tumor progression . Ribosomal protein S6 (S6) could be activated by phosphorylated p70S6K which is a downstream effector of the AKT/mTOR pathway. Activated S6 is related to poor prognosis of NPC via the messenger RNA translation machinery [10-11]. Recent research found that the cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1 activated by PD-L1 would promote phosphorylation of S6 and, initiate the translation process, which played a vital role in tumor occurrence, development, invasion and metastasis [12-13]. However, whether there is abnormal activation of the cell-intrinsic PD-1/PD-L1 axis in NPC, and the relationship between it and S6/p-S6 expression have not been studied yet.
In this study, we evaluated expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1 and p-S6 proteins in 281 cases of NPC and 51 cases of non-cancerous nasopharyngeal epithelia, as well as in 24 primary NPC and their matched metastases, to illustrate the relationship between expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1 and p-S6 proteins and their clinical significances in NPC.
KM Plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/index.php?p=service&cancer=pancancer_rnaseq) was used to detect the prognostic value of PD1, PD-L1 and S6 in head-neck squamous cell carcinoma.
All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Review Board of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (Scientific and Research Ethics Committee, No: Y202/2014), and informed consent was applied to all samples.
All samples were paraffin-embedded tissue, including 281 NPC tissues, 24 primary NPC and their matched metastases, and 51 non-cancerous control nasopharyngeal epithelia, from Department of pathology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University during January 2008 to December 2017. All clinical record and the follow-up data were obtained. These cases were pathologically diagnosed and classified according to the latest WHO (February 2017) stage category of head and neck tumors. NPC patients in the present study did not receive radiotherapy or chemotherapy prior to biopsy. The time period from first diagnosis to the date of death or the last known date alive was defined as the overall survival time. All NPC samples were divided into different clinically stages according to the standard in UJCC/AJCC staging system [14,15]. Epstein-Barr virus encoded RNAs (EBER) were detected by in-situ hybridization. Characteristics of patient were presented in supplementary Table S1.
PD-1, PD-L1 and p-S6 proteins staining was employed by ready-to-use Max Vision TM+ HRP-Polymer anti-Mouse IHC Kit (Dako; Carpintrria, CA) on 4 μm tissue sections. As described in our previous publication , 1:100 dilution of primary antibody to PD-1 (Mouse polyclonal antibody, Catalog #MX033, MXB Biotechnologies, China), PD-L1 (Rabbit monoclonal antibody, Catalog #ab228462, Abcam, UK), and Phospho-S6 (p-S6) Ser235/236 (Rabbit polyclonal antibody, Catalog #4857, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) were used to detected the expression of those three proteins in all samples. Each experiment included positive and negative control slide. To confirm the specificity of the antibody, we used the matched IgG isotype antibody as a negative control.
Immunohistochemical staining was independently evaluated under a light microscope at a magnification of ×200 by Y Zhang and Y Zhan blinded to patients' information. The score calculation method was: cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1  was assessed as positive for NPC cells with a greater than 5 positive percentage. PD-L1  scored NPC by calculating tumor positive scores (TPS). The TPS criterion is the ratio of the sum of positive tumor cells relative to total tumor cells. PD-L1 was regarded as positive when the score was higher than 5. Staining scores ≥2 was considered as positive expression for an optimal cut-off value for p-S6 . The two reviewers scored a concordance rate of 95%, and the discordance were resolved by looking at microscopic slides and discussion again.
The relationship between expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and PD-L1/PD-1 proteins and clinicopathological features in NPC was analyzed using chi-square test. The pairwise association between PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and PD-1/PD-L1 expression in NPC was approached through the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Kaplan‑Meier analysis was hired to draw the overall survival curves, and the log‑rank test was the tool to evaluate statistical significance. Cox comparative hazards model was performed to assess the independent prognostic factors of NPC with PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and PD-1/PD-L1 expression. All the above analysis was completed by SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0) software. Based on two-sided statistical analysis, P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
The expression and subcellular localization of PD-L1, PD-1 and p-S6 proteins in NPC and non-cancerous control nasopharyngeal epithelia were detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). PD-L1 protein staining was located in the membrane of NPC (Figure 1A), while PD-1 protein staining was in the cytoplasm of NPC (Figure 1B). Staining of p-S6 protein was discovered in the cytoplasm in both NPC (Figure 1C) and the control normal nasopharyngeal epithelia (Figure 1D). No staining of PD-L1 protein was in the normal nasopharyngeal epithelia (Figure 1E). No staining showed up in negative control in the NPC (Figure 1F) (IHC, DAB staining, ×200).
The positive expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in NPC was 22.1% (62/281), 62.3% (175/281), 87.2% (245/281), and 17.8% (50/281), respectively. However, the positive expression of these proteins in non-cancerous nasopharyngeal epithelia was dramatically lower 7.8% (4/51), 33.3% (17/51), 51.0% (26/51) and 3.9 (2/51), respectively (all P<0.05) (Figure 2A).
We further investigated expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in the primary NPC and their matched lymph node metastatic lesion. Results in Figure 2B showed that the positive percentage of PD-1 expression in the primary NPC (25.0%, 6/24) was significantly lower than that in matched metastasis (62.5%, 15/24) (P=0.009), as well as the co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 (P=0.009) (Figure 2B). It's worth noting that in these primary and matched metastatic samples, all samples with PD-1 positive also acquired PD-L1 positive. No obvious difference in the expression of PD-L1 and p-S6 protein between primary NPC and their matched metastasis yet (P> 0.05).
PD-L1, PD-1 and p-S6 proteins expression in NPC and non-cancerous nasopharyngeal epithelia was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC). A: PD-L1 protein staining was located in the membrane of NPC. B: PD-1 protein staining was in the cytoplasm of NPC. C and D: Staining of p-S6 protein was discovered in the cytoplasm in both NPC and the control normal nasopharyngeal epithelia. E: No staining of PD-L1 protein was found in the control normal nasopharyngeal epithelia. F: No staining showed up in negative control (NC) in the NPC (IHC, DAB staining, x200).
Positive expression of PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and common expression PD-1/PD-L1 in 281 NPC and 51 non-cancerous control nasopharyngeal epithelia, 24 pairs of primary NPCs and their corresponding metastatic lesion were analyzed by χ2 test. A: The percentages of positive expression of PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and co-expression PD-1/PD-L1 in NPC were evidently higher than those in the non-cancerous nasopharyngeal epithelia (all P<0.05). B: There were significantly lower expression of PD-1 and co-expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in primary NPC compared to the matched metastatic lesion (all P<0.01).
Association between expression of PD-L1, PD-1 and p-S6 proteins and clinicopathological features of NPC (n=281)
|P (%)||N (%)||P (%)||N (%)||P (%)||N (%)||H (%)||L (%)|
|Male (203)||130 (64.0)||73 (36.0)||0.326||46 (22.7)||157 (77.3)||0.697||181 (89.2)||22 (10.8)||0.110||38 (18.7)||165 (81.3)||0.513|
|Female (78)||45 (57.7)||33 (42.3)||16 (20.5)||62 (79.5)||64 (82.1)||14 (17.9)||12 (15.4)||66 (84.6)|
|<50 (146)||88 (60.3)||58 (39.7)||0.471||29 (19.9)||117 (80.1)||0.355||126 (86.3)||20 (13.7)||0.644||27 (18.5)||119 (81.5)||0.750|
|≥50 (135)||87 (64.4)||48 (35.6)||33 (24.4)||102 (75.6)||119 (88.1)||16 (11.9)||23 (17.0)||112 (83.0)|
|DNPC (12)||7 (58.3)||5 (41.7)||0.773||2 (16.7)||10 (83.3)||0.645||9 (75.0)||3 (25.0)||0.197||2 (16.7)||10 (83.3)||0.917|
|UDNPC (269)||168 (62.5)||101 (37.5)||60 (22.3)||209 (77.7)||236 (87.7)||33 (12.3)||48 (17.8)||221 (82.2)|
|Clinical T category|
|T1 (25)||7 (28.0)||18 (72.0)||0.002**||5 (20.0)||20 (80.0)||0.921||19 (76.0)||6 (24.0)||0.357||2 (8.0)||23 (92.0)||0.317|
|T2 (103)||65 (63.1)||38 (36.9)||23 (22.3)||80 (77.7)||91 (88.3)||12 (11.7)||16 (15.5)||87 (84.5)|
|T3 (78)||51 (65.4)||27 (34.6)||19 (24.4)||59 (75.6)||68 (87.2)||10 (12.8)||18 (23.1)||60 (76.9)|
|T4 (75)||52 (69.3)||23 (30.7)||15 (20.0)||60 (80.0)||67 (89.3)||8 (10.7)||14 (18.7)||61 (81.3)|
|Clinical N category|
|N0 (46)||29 (63.0)||17 (37.0)||0.015*||14 (30.4)||32 (60.6)||0.416||43 (93.5)||3 (6.5)||0.180||10 (21.7)||36 (78.3)||0.729|
|N1 (82)||49 (59.8)||33 (40.2)||16 (19.5)||66 (80.5)||72 (87.8)||10 (12.2)||13 (15.9)||69 (84.1)|
|N2 (122)||85 (69.7)||37 (30.3)||24 (19.7)||98 (80.3)||101 (82.8)||21 (17.2)||23 (18.9)||99 (81.1)|
|N3 (31)||12 (38.7)||19 (61.3)||8 (25.8)||23 (74.2)||29 (93.5)||2 (6.5)||4 (12.9)||27 (87.1)|
|Clinical M category|
|M0 (272)||171 (62.9)||101 (37.1)||0.262||59 (21.7)||213 (78.3)||0.407||237 (87.1)||35 (12.9)||0.887||48 (17.6)||224 (82.4)||0.7249|
|M1 (9)||4 (44.4)||5 (55.6)||3 (33.3)||6 (66.7)||8 (88.9)||1 (11.1)||2 (22.2)||7 (77.8)|
|I and II (n=57)||34 (59.6)||23 (40.4)||0.647||10 (17.5)||47 (82.5)||0.357||52 (91.2)||5 (8.8)||0.307||7 (12.3)||50 (87.7)||0.223|
|III and IV (224)||141 (62.9)||83 (37.1)||52 (23.2)||172 (76.8)||193 (86.2)||31 (13.8)||43 (19.2)||181 (80.8)|
|Lymph node status|
|LNM (235)||146 (62.1)||89 (37.9)||0.907||48 (20.4)||187 (79.6)||0.134||202 (86.0)||33 (14.0)||0.163||40 (17.0)||195 (83.0)||0.444|
|No LNM (46)||29 (63.0)||17 (37.0)||14 (30.4)||32 (69.6)||43 (93.5)||3 (6.5)||10 (21.7)||36 (78.3)|
Abbreviations: NPC: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; DNPC: differentiated non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma; UDNPC: undifferentiated non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma; LNM: lymph node metastasis; N negative; P positive.#Co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1; ##the average age of all subjects was 49.8 years;*Correlation is significant at the P<0.05 level (two tailed). **Correlation is significant at the P<0.01 level (two tailed).
We then explored the relationship between cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and co-expression of PD-L1/PD-1 proteins and clinicopathological features of NPC patients including gender, age, clinical T/N/M category, clinical stages, histological type and lymph node metastasis status. These results were displayed in Table 1. The positive percentage of PD-L1 (P =0.002) was statistically lower in NPC patients with clinical T1 category than those in T2, T3 and T4, but the patients with clinical N0, N1 and N2 category was evidently higher than that clinical N3 (P =0.015). However, the positive percentages of PD-1 and co-expression of PD-L1 and PD-1, and p-S6 were not associated with gender, clinical N or M category, clinical stages, histological type and lymph node status (all P> 0.05).
Bioinformatics analysis. A: K-M survival analysis of RPS6 (S6) mRNA expression. B: K-M survival analysis of PDCD1 (PD1) mRNA expression. C: K-M survival analysis of CD274 (PD-L1) mRNA expression.
Furthermore, we investigated whether there were some correlations among these proteins. The relationship between PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 expression and co-expression of PD-L1/PD-1 proteins in 281 NPC patients was shown in Table 2. PD-L1 expression was positively associated with PD-1 (r = 0.219, P <0.001), p-S6 (r = 0.273, P < 0.001) or co-expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 (r=0.366, P <0.001) in NPC. In addition, p-S6 was also positively related to PD-1 (r=0.127, P=0.033) and co-expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 in NPC (r=0.153, P=0.01). Consistent with the notable phenomenon, expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1 was strongly related to combined PD-L1 and PD-1 expression (r=0.885, P<0.001).
The pairwise correlation between expression of PD-L1, PD-1 and p-S6 proteins in the 281 cases of NPC
Values are Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.# Co-expression of PD-1 and PD-1; *Correlation is significant at the P<0.05 level (two tailed); **Correlation is significant at the P<0.05 level (two tailed).
KM-Plotter was used to predict the prognostic value of PD-1, PD-L1 and S6 mRNA expression. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with low expression of RPS6 (S6) and high expression of PDCD1 (PD1) had good prognosis (Figure 3; both P<0.05). However, no significantly prognostic value was seen in CD274 (PD-L1, P>0.05).
Survival situation of NPC patients with differentially expressed cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and co-expression PD-L1 and PD-1 proteins was studied through Kaplan-Meier survival curves (Figure 4). As to NPC patients, overall survival rate was significantly higher in cases with positive expression of PD-L1, compared to ones with negative PD-L1 expression (P=0.035, Figure 4A). On the contrary, NPC patients with positive expression of PD-1 (P=0.031, Figure 4B), p-S6 (P =0.044, Figure 4C) or co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 (P=0.042, Figure 4D) had shorter survival time than others by univariate analysis.
Furthermore, we investigated whether cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and co-expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 proteins could be used as independent prognostic factors for NPC patients. Data in Table 3 revealed that positive expression of PD-L1 protein was identified as an independent good prognostic factor (P=0.002), while positive expression of p-S6 protein (P=0.003), lymph node metastasis (LNM) status (P=0.004), clinical N category (P<0.001), M category (P< 0.001) and clinical stages (P=0.005) were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival of NPC patients. However, patients with positive PD-1 expression and co-expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 had no significant impact on the overall survival of NPC patients (P >0.05, respectively). Other factors including gender, age, histological type and T/N stage category also have no obvious impacts on the prognosis in NPC (all P > 0.05).
Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival of NPC patients with PD-L1, PD-1, p-S6 proteins expression and co-expression of PD-L1/PD-1. A: NPC patients with positive expression of PD-L1 caught a longer OS (overall survival) (P=0.035); B: NPC patients with negative PD-1 staining showed a longer OS (P=0.031); C: NPC patients with negative p-S6 revealed a longer OS (P=0.044); D: NPC patients with common positive expression of PD-L1/PD-1 had a shorter OS (P=0.042).
Summary of multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis used to evaluate overall survival in 281 cases of NPC patients
|Parameter||SE||Wald||Significance||Exp(B)||95.0% CI for Exp(B)|
|Clinical T category||0.169||1.090||0.297||1.193||0.856||1.662|
|Clinical N category||0.167||12.792||0.000**||1.817||1.310||2.521|
|Clinical M category||0.452||16.961||0.000**||6.426||2.651||15.575|
Abbreviations: SE, standard error (SE); Exp (B), exponentiation of the B coefficient; CI, confidence interval; LNM: lymph node metastasis; NPC: nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Note: multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazard regression, *Correlation is significant at the P<0.05 level (two tailed). **Correlation is significant at the P<0.01 level (two tailed).
As a ligand for PD-1, PD-L1 is a transmembrane protein expressed on immune cells and tumor cells encoded by the CD274 gene. It is not only a cancer-promoting factor in some certain malignant tumors, such as gastric cancer and esophageal cancer, also as protective factor in some other tumors including Merkel cell carcinoma and breast cancer [19-24]. However, the roles of PD-L1 action in NPC is not clear. It has been reported that short overall survival time of NPC patients was related to high expression of PD-L1 [25-26]. But other research results drew an opposite conclusion that patients with high PD-L1 expression obtained a better prognosis [27-29], which was in line with our results. We found that there was significant higher positive expression of PD-L1, PD-1, p-S6 and combined PD-1 and PD-L1 in NPC than that of in non-cancerous nasopharyngeal epithelia. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression had effects on T-stage category of NPC. In conclusion, overexpression of PD-1, PD-L1, combined PD-L1 and PD-1 and p-S6 were all related with tumorigenesis.
Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that positive expression of PD-L1 in NPC patients had a lower death risk. In fact, the association between the expression of PD-L1 and tumor immune evasion is not directly proportional, and may just represent the persistence of anti-tumor response . Here's more evidence that PD-L1 could take part in the regulation of anti-tumor immunity. It was found that AhR (Aryl hydrocarbon receptor) activation could mediate the expression of PD-1 in CD8+ T cells. Maybe their co-stimulators AhR induced the correlation expression between PD-1 and combined PD-L1 and PD-1 expression [31-32]. The secretion of interferon gamma (IFNγ) and the enhancement of tumor PD-L1 expression promote each other, resulting in CD8+ and CD3+ T cells enrichment around NPC tissues, and the accumulation of these immune cells promotes the immune response to tumor tissue [30, 33-34].
As ligands of PD-1, PD-L1 and PD-L2 are mostly found in tumor cells and antigen presenting cells. And they will inhibit the tumor cell death through down-regulating the T cell response when they bind to PD-1. The transmembrane receptor PD-1 is a prominent checkpoint primarily expressing on T cells [35-36]. PD-1 plays vital roles in promoting NPC growth and is related to the short overall survival time in NPC patients . Studies focused on PD-1 protein in NPC have primarily examined PD-1 expression in lymphocytes [38-39]. Kleffel's team firstly reported that PD-1 protein was also presented in cancer cells and promoted tumor occurrence and development in melanoma . Other studies have also shown cell-intrinsic PD-1 promotes the development of liver cancer and pancreatic cancer, and shortens the survival rate [16, 40]. Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 promotes tumor occurrence such as hepatocellular carcinoma and melanoma by activating the mTOR signaling . In pancreatic cancer, cell-intrinsic PD-1 promoted tumor growth through the Hippo signaling pathway outside the immune system [4, 20]. However, Du et al found that cell-intrinsic PD-1 was presented in NSCLC as a tumor suppressor . In current study, we proved that patients with positive expression of PD-1 in NPC tissues had shorter survival time, which is consistent with findings in most malignancies. We also demonstrated that the positive expression rate of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1 in metastatic NPC lesions was obviously higher than that in primary lesions. Although we haven't discovered statistical difference of the expression of PD-1 in primary NPC with or without lymph node metastasis, it was worth noting that the immune morphology of NPC cells altered during distant metastasis. Consequently, cell-intrinsic PD-1 might, we speculated, participate in the distant metastases of NPC. However, the number of matched primary/metastatic and lymph node metastases is limited, so further experimentation with larger size is needed to confirm the association between PD-1 expression and the NPC metastasis.
The PI3K signaling pathway participates PD-L1 expression regulation. S6 is one of the downstream targets in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Overexpression of p-S6 results in mTOR signaling pathway dysregulation [42-44]. PD-1 promoted S6 phosphorylation and tumor proliferation in melanoma . Our results showed that positive p-S6 expression shortened overall survival in NPC patients, and there was an association between p-S6 expression and PD-L1 and PD-1 expression. At the same time, the p-S6 positive rate in patients with co-expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 was significantly higher than other patients. Hence, we speculated that PD-1 might also play an encouraging role in S6 phosphorylation in NPC. In conclusion, expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1, co-expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 and p-S6 are correlational, especially between PD-1 and combined PD-L1 and PD-1 expression. However, these need to be further verified by in vitro and in vivo study in the future experiments.
In summary, in our study, there was significantly higher positive expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1, PD-L1, p-S6 and co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in NPC. Furthermore, PD-1 might also be involved in the metastatic spread of NPC. Positive PD-L1 expression associated with PD-1 and p-S6 expression, high expression of PD-L1 and p-S6 could serve as valuable independent prognostic biomarkers for NPC patients.
Positive expression of PD-L1 associates with expression of cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1 and p-S6, PD-L1 might serve as a good prognostic biomarker and p-S6 could be a valuable independent poor prognostic biomarker for NPC patients.
PD-L1: programmed cell death ligand 1; PD-1: programmed death 1; NPC: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; IFNγ: interferon gamma.
Supplementary table S1.
This study was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundations of China (No: 81972838, 81773218 and 81802791) and The Natural Sciences Foundations of Hunan Province (No: 2018JJ3858).
Written Informed consent was legally obtained and all research protocols were approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (Scientific and Research Ethics Committee, No. Y202/2014).
Experiment design and manuscript editing were done by Dr. SF. Y Zhang wrote the manuscript and made the tables. HZ and Y Zhan collected clinical statistics. YY, YN and HW participated in the experiment. WW checked the manuscript and gave the suggestions.
The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
1. Cho WC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: molecular biomarker discovery and progress. Mol Cancer. 2007;6:1
2. Chen YP, Chan A, Le QT. et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2019;394:64-80
3. Tuan JK, Ha TC, Ong WS. et al. Late toxicities after conventional radiation therapy alone for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2012;104:305-11
4. Qu Y, Chen Y, Yu H. et al. Survival and Prognostic Analysis of Primary Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in North China. Clin Lab. 2015;61:699-708
5. Wu F, Wang R, Lu H. et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: treatment outcomes of a prospective, multicentric clinical study. Radiother Oncol. 2014;112:106-11
6. Yang H, Chen X, Lin S. et al. Treatment outcomes after reduction of the target volume of intensity-modulated radiotherapy following induction chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective, multi-center, randomized clinical trial. Radiother Oncol. 2018;126:37-42
7. Xiao Z, Chen Z. Deciphering nasopharyngeal carcinoma pathogenesis via proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2019;16:475-85
8. Kleffel S, Posch C, Barthel SR. et al. Melanoma Cell-Intrinsic PD-1 Receptor Functions Promote Tumor Growth. Cell. 2015;162:1242-56
9. Ishida Y, Agata Y, Shibahara K. et al. Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J. 1992;11:3887-95
10. Chung J, Kuo CJ, Crabtree GR. et al. Rapamycin-FKBP specifically blocks growth-dependent activation of and signaling by the 70 kd S6 protein kinases. Cell. 1992;69:1227-36
11. Wang W, Wen Q, Xu L. et al. Activation of Akt/mTOR pathway is associated with poor prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Plos One. 2014;9:e106098
12. Yao H, Wang H, Li C. et al. Cancer Cell-Intrinsic PD-1 and Implications in Combinatorial Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1774
13. de Vicente JC, Pena I, Rodrigo JP. et al. Phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 correlation with p21 expression and inverse association with tumor size in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2017;39:1876-87
14. Huang SH, O'Sullivan B. Overview of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2017;18:40
15. Pan JJ, Ng WT, Zong JF. et al. Prognostic nomogram for refining the prognostication of the proposed 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer. 2016;122:3307-15
16. Pu N, Gao S, Yin H. et al. Cell-intrinsic PD-1 promotes proliferation in pancreatic cancer by targeting CYR61/CTGF via the hippo pathway. Cancer Lett. 2019;460:42-53
17. Chinn Z, Stoler MH, Mills AM. PD-L1 and IDO expression in cervical and vulvar invasive and intraepithelial squamous neoplasias: implications for combination immunotherapy. Histopathology. 2019;74:256-68
18. Liu Z, Yun R, Yu X. et al. Overexpression of Notch3 and pS6 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Human Ovarian Epithelial Cancer. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:5953498
19. D'Alterio C, Nasti G, Polimeno M. et al. CXCR4-CXCL12-CXCR7, TLR2-TLR4, and PD-1/PD-L1 in colorectal cancer liver metastases from neoadjuvant-treated patients. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1254313
20. Boger C, Behrens HM, Mathiak M. et al. PD-L1 is an independent prognostic predictor in gastric cancer of Western patients. Oncotarget. 2016;7:24269-83
21. Yagi T, Baba Y, Ishimoto T. et al. PD-L1 Expression, Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Surgically Resected Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg. 2019;269:471-8
22. Giraldo NA, Nguyen P, Engle EL. et al. Multidimensional, quantitative assessment of PD-1/PD-L1 expression in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma and association with response to pembrolizumab. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6:99
23. Tsang JY, Au WL, Lo KY. et al. PD-L1 expression and tumor infiltrating PD-1+ lymphocytes associated with outcome in HER2+ breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;162:19-30
24. Wang X, Teng F, Kong L. et al. PD-L1 expression in human cancers and its association with clinical outcomes. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:5023-39
25. Zhou Y, Shi D, Miao J. et al. PD-L1 predicts poor prognosis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma irrespective of PD-1 and EBV-DNA load. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43627
26. Zheng L, Cao C, Cheng G. et al. Cytomembranic PD-L1 expression in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:5483-87
27. Zhu Q, Cai MY, Chen CL. et al. Tumor cells PD-L1 expression as a favorable prognosis factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with pre-existing intratumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1312240
28. Lee VH, Lo AW, Leung CY. et al. Correlation of PD-L1 Expression of Tumor Cells with Survival Outcomes after Radical Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Non-Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Plos One. 2016;11:e157969
29. Liu YJ, Tsang NM, Hsueh C. et al. Low PD-L1 Expression Strongly Correlates with Local Recurrence in Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Radiation-Based Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2018 10
30. Taube JM, Anders RA, Young GD. et al. Colocalization of inflammatory response with B7-h1 expression in human melanocytic lesions supports an adaptive resistance mechanism of immune escape. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:127ra37
31. Liu Y, Liang X, Dong W. et al. Tumor-Repopulating Cells Induce PD-1 Expression in CD8(+) T Cells by Transferring Kynurenine and AhR Activation. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:480-94.e7
32. Wang GZ, Zhang L, Zhao XC. et al. The Aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediates tobacco-induced PD-L1 expression and is associated with response to immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1125
33. Spranger S, Spaapen RM, Zha Y. et al. Up-regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and T(regs) in the melanoma tumor microenvironment is driven by CD8(+) T cells. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:200ra116
34. Ohigashi Y, Sho M, Yamada Y. et al. Clinical significance of programmed death-1 ligand-1 and programmed death-1 ligand-2 expression in human esophageal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:2947-53
35. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Targeting the PD-1/B7-H1(PD-L1) pathway to activate anti-tumor immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24:207-12
36. Wang Y, Wang H, Yao H. et al. Regulation of PD-L1: Emerging Routes for Targeting Tumor Immune Evasion. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:536
37. Jiang F, Yu W, Zeng F. et al. PD-1 high expression predicts lower local disease control in stage IV M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:503
38. Tang Y, He Y, Shi L. et al. Co-expression of AFAP1-AS1 and PD-1 predicts poor prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:39001-11
39. Hsu MC, Hsiao JR, Chang KC. et al. Increase of programmed death-1-expressing intratumoral CD8 T cells predicts a poor prognosis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2010;23:1393-403
40. Li H, Li X, Liu S, Guo L, Zhang B, Zhang J. et al. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) checkpoint blockade in combination with a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor restrains hepatocellular carcinoma growth induced by hepatoma cell-intrinsic PD-1. Hepatology. 2017;66:1920-33
41. Du S, McCall N, Park K. et al. Blockade of Tumor-Expressed PD-1 promotes lung cancer growth. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1408747
42. Chen J, Jiang CC, Jin L. et al. Regulation of PD-L1: a novel role of pro-survival signaling in cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:409-16
43. Yang C, Peng J, Jiang W. et al. mTOR activation in immature cells of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma and anti-tumor effect of rapamycin in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2013;341:186-94
44. Huang XM, Dai CB, Mou ZL. et al. Overproduction of cyclin D1 is dependent on activated mTORC1 signal in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: implication for therapy. Cancer Lett. 2009;279:47-56
Corresponding authors: Songqing Fan, E-mail: songqingfanedu.cn, and Weiyuan Wang, E-mail: weiyuanwangedu.cn.