J Cancer 2017; 8(16):3226-3231. doi:10.7150/jca.20587

Research Paper

Association between Sumoylation-Related Gene rs77447679 Polymorphism and Risk of Gastric Cancer (GC) in a Chinese Population

Ying Luo1*, Sihong You2, 3*, Jirong Wang3, 4*, Shuling Fan1, Jie Shi5, Ai Peng1 Corresponding address, Tingting Yu3 Corresponding address

1. Department of Nephrology & Rheumatology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China;
2. Department of gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, China;
3. Department of Developmental Genetics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China;
4. Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, China;
5. Nanjing Red Cross Blood Center, Nanjing 210003, China.
* Ying Luo, Sihong You and Jirong Wang contributed equally to this study and share first authorship.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
How to cite this article:
Luo Y, You S, Wang J, Fan S, Shi J, Peng A, Yu T. Association between Sumoylation-Related Gene rs77447679 Polymorphism and Risk of Gastric Cancer (GC) in a Chinese Population. J Cancer 2017; 8(16):3226-3231. doi:10.7150/jca.20587. Available from http://www.jcancer.org/v08p3226.htm

Abstract

Purpose: Sumoylation plays a critical role in gene regulation and tumorigenesis, and is hypothesized to correlate with the development of various cancers. So far, there has been no reported association between sumoylation-related genes and the risk of gastric cancer (GC).

Methods: A total of 17 tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (tag-SNPs) in 5 sumoylation-related genes were selected and genotyped by SNaPshot in a case-control study, including 1021 GC patients and 1304 controls. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidential interval (CI) were computed to evaluate the genetic association of the onset of GC.

Results: We demonstrated that CBX4 rs77447679 polymorphism was significantly associated with GC risk (P= 0.017; adjusted OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.10-2.66). The patients with CC genotype had a lower risk of GC (CC vs. CA+AA, P= 0.017; adjusted OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.04-1.49).

Conclusion: This study revealed that CBX4 rs77447679 polymorphism was positively associated with GC, and individuals with CC genotype had less risk of GC. The risky effects and functional effect of this polymorphism in GC require further investigation.

Keywords: sumoylation, haploview, polymorphism, gastric cancer, susceptibility.

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cancer diagnosed in men and the fifth in women globally [1]. Multiple pathogenic factors, such as unhealthy lifestyle, and Helicobacter pylori infection, contribute to the etiology of GC [2]. Consistent with multifactorial pathogenesis, clinical outcomes and GC prevalence might result from environmental factors. Besides, the influence of host-specific factors, especially host genetic variation, could impose a remarkable effect on the susceptibility of GC in a population with high incidence rate. [3].

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) include enzymatic changes such as addition of chemical group adducts, including several ubiquitin, small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMO) and phosphor. These changes play an essential role in gene regulation, cellular function, tissue development, and metabolism, and they are closely relevant to cancer occurrence [4, 5]. Understanding the influence of sumoylation on gene regulation and protein homeostasis could provide valuable insights of early diagnosis and treatment for cancer [6]. Sumoylation refers to the post-translational process that a SUMO protein moiety is enzymatically conjugated to a substrate protein [7, 8]. Sumoylation requires the following series of enzymatic events: A. SUMO-activation by enzyme E1, including SUMO-activation enzyme E1 (SAE1) and ubiquitin-activating enzyme 2 (UBA2); B. SUMO-conjugation by enzyme E2, such as UBC9 and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 2I (UBE2I); C. SUMO-ligation by enzyme E3, such as ran-binding protein 2 (RANBP2) and polycomb chromobox homolog 4 (CBX4) [4, 9-12]. The sumoylation pathway, one of the most important PTMs, was closely related with pathogenesis of human diseases through regulation of genome stability, gene expression, nuclear functions, and protein-protein interactions [13-15]. Besides, sumoylation is also relevant in various cancers, including prostate cancer, bladder cancer, brain cancer, breast cancer, and cervical carcinoma, through the mediation of some key oncogenes and tumor suppressors [9, 16-19]. Recently, some current GC-association studies for sumoylation have existed [20, 21], but knowledge of the detailed mechanism of GC carcinogenesis is still unclear. So far, there is no study focusing on the influence of sumoylation-related genes on the risk of GC.

This study focuses on the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in the functional region of sumoylation-related genes, and we aim to provide a new perspective on the mechanism of GC. We performed a case-control study of tag-SNPs in 5 potential sumoylation-related genes (RANBP2, SAE1, UBE2I, UBA2 and CBX4) in a Chinese population, and CBX4 rs77447679 has been identified significantly associated with GC.

Methods and Materials

Study participants

A total of 1021 histopathologically confirmed GC patients and 1304 GC-free participants without a family history of GC (as control group) were enrolled in this study. All participants were genetically unrelated Han Chinese. These GC patients had been referred to the Department of Oncology in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Tongji University School of Medicine in China, between 2011 and 2014. The disease-free controls were enrolled from those sought routinely physical examination in the outpatient department of these hospitals. A standardized questionnaire was developed and used to obtain basic demographic information and clinical characteristics of the participants. This study was approved by each of the participating institutes' ethics committee, in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration (Approval Number: SHSY-IEC-pap-16-15), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study (both patients and control).

SNP selection

The potential SNPs were screened and selected from unrelated Han Chinese genotype data from the 1000 Genome Project database. Identification of the tag-SNPs was performed in the Haploview 4.2 software (BROAD institute, Cambridge, MA, UK) with pairwise option, using r2=0.8 as the threshold. Besides, we also scanned these tag-SNPs' corresponding minor allele frequencies (MAFs) in the NCBI SNP database, and excluded those without reports in Chinese population or MAF < 0.05. The identification number of the final candidate tag-SNPs, their relative positions in the genome, and the linkage disequilibrium (LD) of these tag-SNPs are shown in Fig 1.

DNA extraction and genotyping

Approximately 10 ml whole blood from each participant was extracted and transferred into an ACD tube. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples by proteinase K (Roche Applied Science, IN, USA) digestion and phenol-chloroform extraction. DNA extraction was performed in the laminar flow hood using sterile techniques. Genotypes of the 33 tag-SNPs were determined by SNaPshot (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The primers to amplify different fragments, including each tag-SNP, were designed with the Primer 5 software (PREMIER Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Amplifications were performed in the ABI3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA), and allelic discrimination was completed using the GeneMapperTM software (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA), using manufacturers' instruction and protocols. Positive controls through sequencing and negative controls without DNA samples were contained in each plate to ensure the accuracy of genotyping. The genotyping procedure in this study was conducted in a double-blinded way. Approximately 10% of the total samples were randomly selected for duplicated assays, and the results were 100% concordant.

 Figure 1 

Hapmaps of Sumoylation-related genes: A. Hapmap of RANBP2; B. Hapmap of UBE2I; C. Hapmap of CBX4; D. Hapmap of UBA2 and E. Hapmap of SAE.

J Cancer Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

Statistical analysis

χ2 test and Student's t-test were performed to quantify the differences of demographic characteristics, selected variables, genotype frequencies and allele distributions between the case (GC-patient) and control groups. Association between genetic variation and the risk of GC was estimated by odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) from an unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for age and sex. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for each SNP in the case and control groups were checked using χ2 test. P< 0.05 was considered as statistically significant in this study. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 23.0 software (SPSS, Inc., IL, USA).

Results

Characteristics of the study cases and controls

1021 patients (case group) with histopathologically confirmed GC (806 patients, comprising 79% of all cases were non-cardia, and the remaining 21% were cardia) and 1304 healthy participants (control group) were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference of age or sex between the case and control groups. 470 patients (46%) had clinical stage I/II GC, and the other 551 (54%) were in stage III/IV GC. The demographic information and clinical characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1.

Association between SUMO gene polymorphisms and the risk of GC

19 potential SNPs were selected from RANBP2, UBE2I, CBX4, UBA2 and SAE1 genes as the candidate sumoylation-related tag-SNPs. The characteristics of these 19 tag-SNPs, as well as the allele frequencies of the polymorphisms among the case and control groups are reported in Table 2. After SNP genotyping, 5 SNPs (UBE2I rs8062881, rs75998799 and rs12925270, CBX4 rs190846371, and SAE1 rs6509314) were excluded because of their low MAF (P < 0.05). The observed genotype frequencies of the SUMO genes were consistent with the HWE. Of the remaining 14 SNPs, there was significant difference between the case and control group for rs77447679 in CBX4 gene, and consequently strong association between SNP rs77447679 and the risk of GC (P = 0.017; adjusted OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.07-1.44).

 Table 1 

Demographic and clinical characteristics of GC patient (cases) and control groups.

VariablesCases N = 1021Control N = 1304P
age0.364
≤60459 (0.45)612 (0.47)
>60562 (0.55)692 (0.53)
sex0.321
male715 (0.70)887 (0.68)
female306 (0.30)417 (0.32)
Tumor site
Non-carida806 (0.79)
Cardia214 (0.21)
TNM stage
I/II470 (0.46)
III/IV551 (0.54)
 Table 2 

Tag-SNPs results for GC in sumolytion-related genes.

SNPGeneCHRpositionMajor alleleMinor alleleMAF in controlOR (95% CI)aPa
rs12614691RANBP22109362565AG0.0921.08 (0.88-1.33)0.465
rs8062881UBE2I161361651CG0.0360.98 (0.71-1.34)0.885
rs12920764UBE2I161362187TC0.0730.94 (0.75-1.18)0.605
rs75998799UBE2I161366079GA0.0201.14 (0.72-1.79)0.576
rs761059UBE2I161374524GA0.1060.92 (0.72-1.16)0.473
rs12925270UBE2I161375937CA0.0490.86 (0.61-1.21)0.372
rs1285251CBX41777809823CT0.3431.10 (0.97-1.25)0.153
rs1285249CBX41777810143GC0.1561.03 (0.87-1.21)0.756
rs73422123CBX41777810391TC0.2890.97 (0.85-1.10)0.606
rs77447679CBX41777810474CA0.166 1.24 (1.04-1.49)0.017
rs2289728CBX41777811854AG0.4881.06 (0.94-1.19)0.316
rs1285243CBX41777814106TC0.1770.96 (0.82-1.13)0.641
rs12980229UBA21934914144AG0.1260.98 (0.82-1.18)0.851
rs177918SAE11947634313GT0.1870.92 (0.79-1.07)0.272
rs309184SAE11947636827TG0.4031.01 (0.90-1.14)0.848
rs55801246SAE11947650489CT0.0800.90 (0.72-1.12)0.337
rs12611339SAE11947684084GA0.1711.02 (0.87-1.21)0.786
rs3745621SAE11947689921CG0.2750.89 (0.78-1.02)0.091
rs6509314SAE11947696626TC0.0421.00 (0.73-1.35)0.983

a adjusted for age and sex in logistic regression

Detailed allele distributions of rs77447679 in the case and control groups are shown in Table 3. Individuals with the CA genotype had significantly higher risk of GC, (1.71-fold compared to the baseline genotype CC, P= 0.018; adjusted OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.10-2.66); besides, recessive model also had a significantly increased risk of GC (CC vs. CA+AA, P= 0.017; adjusted OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.04-1.49). However, there was no statistically significant difference of AA genotype between the patient and control groups (P= 0.065; adjusted OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.99-1.44).

 Table 3 

Genotype frequencies of CBX4 rs77447679 polymorphism in GC patients and controls.

rs77447679 genotypeControlsOR (95% CI)aPa
C>ACases
CC6488901.00 (Reference)
CA2963411.71 (1.10-2.66)0.018
AA46401.19 (0.99-1.44)0.065
CA+AA3423811.24 (1.04-1.49)0.017
CC+CA94412311.00 (Reference)
AA46401.63 (1.05-2.52)0.030

a Adjustment for age and sex in logistic regression

Discussion

In this study, we have identified 17 tag-SNPs in 5 sumoylation-related genes (RANBP2, SAE1, UBE2I, UBA2 and CBX4) and quantified their association with GC susceptibility in a Chinese population. We demonstrated that CBX4 rs77447679 was significantly associated with the risk of GC, and individuals with CA genotype had a significantly higher risk of GC, comparing to the baseline CC genotype. This is a pioneer investigation to quantify the relationship between the sumoylation-related gene polymorphism and the risk of GC in Chinese population.

First reported in 1996, sumoylation modifies various eukaryotic proteins [7]. Sumoylation is governed by a conserved cascade consisting an E1-activating enzyme complex, an E2-conjugating enzyme and an E3 ligase [22]. The 5 sumoylation-related genes involved in this study (RANBP2, SAE1, UBE2I, UBA2, and CBX4) are responsible for gene regulation of the E1 enzyme complex, E2 or multiple E3 ligases. In this study, we have demonstrated that CBX4 polymorphism had strong association with GC development. CBX4 gene is a critical component of the polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1), which synergizes with PRC2 to silence gene expression by specifically modifying nucleosomal histones [23-25]. Additionally, CBX4 is a SUMO E3 ligase, which could upregulate the sumoylation of a more limited repertoire of substrate involved in tumorigenesis [26, 27]. Several recent studies have reported that CBX4 is closely related with the proliferation and differentiation of cloned embryos, thymic epithelial cells, and transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [28-31]. Furthermore, CBX4 expression has been reported to upregulate tumor tissues, and higher CBX4 expression is correlated with the α-fetoprotein (AFP) level in serum, tumor size, pathological differentiation, and the TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) stages in HCC [32]. In addition, Jiao HK et al. demonstrated that CBX4 could promote angiogenesis and metastasis in HCC by the sumoylation pathway dependent on the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α protein and could be an independent prognostic factor for HCC patients [30]. The amplification and biological roles of the CBX4 gene have not yet been reported in GC. Regarding its well-known role in HCC, we hypothesize that CBX4 gene is involved in the pathogenesis of GC. However, subsequent studies on different populations are needed to confirm our finding.

This study has suggested that SNPs in gene's functional regions could influence gene expression and functions [33-35]. Thus, 7 selected tag-SNPs (rs1285251, rs1285249, rs73422123, rs77447679, rs2289728, rs190846371, and rs1285243) of the CBX4 genes, located in the functional regions of CBX4, were examined for their potential association with GC. CBX4 rs77447679 variant could be involved in the development of GC and leading to abnormal expression of CBX4 proteins; moreover, patients with CC genotype had a lower risk of GC, which suggested that the C to A substitution of CBX4 rs77447679 could increase the transcription and expression of CBX4, and contribute to the development of GC (P= 0.018; adjusted OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.10-2.66). Thus, CBX4 rs77447679 polymorphism is a biologically plausible factor in GC. The association between CBX4 gene polymorphism and cancer risk has been reported in previous studies [36]. In a large-scale study of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), it was demonstrated that CBX4 gene was substantially amplified and upregulated in a Chinese population and could act as oncogenes and potential therapeutic targets in ESCC. Recurrent focal CNAs, including amplified chromosomal segments containing CBX4, were validated in ESCC, which implied that CBX4 amplification and the corresponding protein upregulation contributed to the development of ESCC [36]. Our findings on CBX4 rs77447679 polymorphism were consistent with previous studies of ESCC, which together could provide a novel interventional target for GC patients and people with certain susceptible genotypes (e.g., CC comparing to CA) and thus with a higher GC risk. We expect a better understanding of sumoylation in the occurrence and development of GC.

There were, however, some limitations in this study. First, multiple factors, such as age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, and dietary habits, might influence the development of GC, and stratification would be recommended. Besides, the expression of CBX4 proteins in patients' tumor tissues and controls, as well as the underlying mechanisms of this polymorphism in GC-related genes require further investigation. Finally, this case-control study was based on hospital participants, so there was inherent possibility of selection bias.

Conclusion

We have identified that the CBX4 rs77447679 polymorphism was statistically significantly associated with GC, and individuals with CC genotype had lower GC risk. More comprehensive investigation is necessary to evaluate the interactions between the genetic and environmental factors, as well as the underlying mechanisms of the association between rs77447679 polymorphism and the risk of GC.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 2016KJ048), the National Science Foundation of China for Young Scientists (grant no. 81602944 and 81602431), the excellent young teachers program of school of basic medical sciences in Nanjing Medical University (grant no. 12JC014), and the Key Project supported by Medical Science and technology development Foundation, Nanjing Department of Health (grant no. YKK16216).

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69-90

2. O'Connor A, Gisbert JP, O'Morain C, Ladas S. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection 2015. Helicobacter. 2015;20(Suppl 1):54-61

3. Chiurillo MA. Role of gene polymorphisms in gastric cancer and its precursor lesions: current knowledge and perspectives in Latin American countries. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(16):4503-4515

4. Chen Z, Lu W. Roles of ubiquitination and SUMOylation on prostate cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(3):4560-4580

5. Kim JH, Choi HJ, Kim B, Kim MH, Lee JM, Kim IS. et al. Roles of sumoylation of a reptin chromatin-remodelling complex in cancer metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(6):631-639

6. Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Velculescu VE, Zhou S, Diaz LA Jr, Kinzler KW. Cancer genome landscapes. Science. 2013;339(6127):1546-1558

7. Matunis MJ, Coutavas E, Blobel G. A novel ubiquitin-like modification modulates the partitioning of the Ran-GTPase-activating protein RanGAP1 between the cytosol and the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1996;135(6 Pt 1):1457-1470

8. Rodriguez A, Pangas SA. Regulation of germ cell function by SUMOylation. Cell Tissue Res. 2015

9. Mattoscio D, Casadio C, Fumagalli M, Sideri M, Chiocca S. The SUMO conjugating enzyme UBC9 as a biomarker for cervical HPV infections. Ecancermedicalscience. 2015;9:534

10. Delfino DV, Spinicelli S, Pozzesi N, Pierangeli S, Velardi E, Bruscoli S. et al. Glucocorticoid-induced activation of caspase-8 protects the glucocorticoid-induced protein Gilz from proteasomal degradation and induces its binding to SUMO-1 in murine thymocytes. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18(1):183-190

11. Li B, Zhou J, Liu P, Hu J, Jin H, Shimono Y, Takahashi M, Xu G. Polycomb protein Cbx4 promotes SUMO modification of de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a. Biochem J. 2007;405(2):369-378

12. Iyer LM, Koonin EV, Aravind L. Novel predicted peptidases with a potential role in the ubiquitin signaling pathway. Cell Cycle. 2004;3(11):1440-1450

13. Yang XJ, Chiang CM. Sumoylation in gene regulation, human disease, and therapeutic action. F1000Prime Rep. 2013;5:45

14. Zhao J. Sumoylation regulates diverse biological processes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64(23):3017-3033

15. Cashman R, Cohen H, Ben-Hamo R, Zilberberg A, Efroni S. SENP5 mediates breast cancer invasion via a TGFbetaRI SUMOylation cascade. Oncotarget. 2014;5(4):1071-1082

16. Tan M, Gong H, Wang J, Tao L, Xu D, Bao E, Liu Z, Qiu J. SENP2 regulates MMP13 expression in a bladder cancer cell line through SUMOylation of TBL1/TBLR1. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13996

17. Srivenugopal KS, Rawat A, Niture SK, Paranjpe A, Velu C, Venugopal SN, Madala HR, Basak D, Punganuru SR. Posttranslational Regulation of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) and new opportunities for treatment of brain cancers. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2015

18. Puhr M, Hoefer J, Eigentler A, Dietrich D, van Leenders G, Uhl B. et al. PIAS1 is a determinant of poor survival and acts as a positive feedback regulator of AR signaling through enhanced AR stabilization in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2015

19. Kim KI, Baek SH. SUMOylation code in cancer development and metastasis. Mol Cells. 2006;22(3):247-253

20. Song JG, Xie HH, Li N, Wu K, Qiu JG, Shen DM, Huang CJ. SUMO-specific protease 6 promotes gastric cancer cell growth via deSUMOylation of FoxM1. Tumour biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. 2015;36(12):9865-9871

21. Ren YH, Liu KJ, Wang M, Yu YN, Yang K, Chen Q. et al. De-SUMOylation of FOXC2 by SENP3 promotes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2014;5(16):7093-7104

22. Geiss-Friedlander R, Melchior F. Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(12):947-956

23. Volkel P, Angrand PO. The control of histone lysine methylation in epigenetic regulation. Biochimie. 2007;89(1):1-20

24. Simon JA, Kingston RE. Mechanisms of polycomb gene silencing: knowns and unknowns. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(10):697-708

25. Li J, Xu Y, Jiao H, Wang W, Mei Z, Chen G. Sumoylation of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha and its significance in cancer. Sci China Life Sci. 2014;57(7):657-664

26. Kagey MH, Melhuish TA, Wotton D. The polycomb protein Pc2 is a SUMO E3. Cell. 2003;113(1):127-137

27. Wotton D, Merrill JC. Pc2 and SUMOylation. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35(Pt 6):1401-1404

28. Hao L, Midic U, Garriga J, Latham KE. Contribution of CBX4 to cumulus oophorus cell phenotype in mice and attendant effects in cumulus cell cloned embryos. Physiol Genomics. 2014;46(2):66-80

29. Liu B, Liu YF, Du YR, Mardaryev AN, Yang W, Chen H. et al. Cbx4 regulates the proliferation of thymic epithelial cells and thymus function. Development. 2013;140(4):780-788

30. Jiao HK, Xu Y, Li J, Wang W, Mei Z, Long XD, Chen GQ. Prognostic significance of Cbx4 expression and its beneficial effect for transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1689

31. Li J, Xu Y, Long XD, Wang W, Jiao HK, Mei Z. et al. Cbx4 governs HIF-1alpha to potentiate angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma by its SUMO E3 ligase activity. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(1):118-131

32. Wang B, Tang J, Liao D, Wang G, Zhang M, Sang Y. et al. Chromobox homolog 4 is correlated with prognosis and tumor cell growth in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(Suppl 3):S684-692

33. Xu M, Qiang F, Gao Y, Kang M, Wang M, Tao G. et al. Evaluation of a novel functional single-nucleotide polymorphism (rs35010275 G>C) in MIR196A2 promoter region as a risk factor of gastric cancer in a Chinese population. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(26):e173

34. Putra AC, Tanimoto K, Arifin M, Hiyama K. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha polymorphisms are associated with genetic aberrations in lung cancer. Respirology. 2011;16(5):796-802

35. Bienkiewicz J, Smolarz B, Malinowski A. Association Between Single Nucleotide Polymorphism +276G > T (rs1501299) in ADIPOQ and Endometrial Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2015

36. Zhang L, Zhou Y, Cheng C, Cui H, Cheng L, Kong P. et al. Genomic analyses reveal mutational signatures and frequently altered genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96(4):597-611

Author contact

Corresponding address Corresponding authors: Ai Peng, Department of Nephrology & Rheumatology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine. No.301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai 200072, China. Tel: 86-21-66303643; Fax:86-21-66303644; E-mail: pengaiedu.cn. Tingting Yu, Department of Developmental Genetics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. No.101 Longmian Road, Nanjing 211166, China. Tel/Fax: 86-25-86869463; E-mail: tingtingedu.cn.


Received 2017-4-15
Accepted 2017-8-14
Published 2017-9-15